It’s simple because he’s really is obsessed with data. I know that seems like statement of the bleedin’ obvious but its worth saying. This is good news because he really does know what he’s talking about. If you want to appreciate how much he cares, watch this TED.com talk from February 2009:
In it he talks about his concept of Linked Data, which asks for 3 things:
Individual bits of data should also be given web addresses, that’s an address beginning with http for every bit of data within another document: people, places, events, products, genes, chemicals etc etc.
That data appears in some sort of useful protocol.
When we get the information it also contains relationships – and whenever it expresses a relationship, the thing it relates too also has an address starting with http.
So Tim Berners-Lee cares about much more than the mechanics of how we move to HTML 5 (the new rules for how we will work the www). He cares about how data can make government more transparent and help knowledge evolve faster. His role will include (hat tip to Tom Scott):
overseeing the creation of a single online point of access and work with departments to make this part of their routine operations.
helping to select and implement common standards for the release of public data
developing Crown Copyright and ‘Crown Commons’ licenses and extending these to the wider public sector
driving the use of the internet to improve consultation processes.
working with the Government to engage with the leading experts internationally working on public data and standards
He also believes in the power of grassroots movements. That’s Us. As he puts it in the talk:
I asked people to put their documents on this web thing, and you did! Thanks. It’s been a blast.
He understands that the remarkable thing about the internet is we built it. It flourishes because we choose to share stuff with each other using the rules he created back in the late 80’s and early 90’s.
So a world wide web of Linked Data is not something he expects big commerce or big government to take sole responsibility for. He expects us to learn how to do it, just as every time we add something to Facebook we show that we have learnt how to play our part in making the World Wide Web.
You might also want to listen to this interview with Rory Cellan-Jones, about the problems of bureacracy. Emma Mulqueeny thinks his reputation will bring much needed “serious intervention” to a data muddle, while Paul Canning echoes that, hoping that (with the departure of Tom Watson from the Cabinet Office) Sir Tim might be able to act as a data head-banger.
This has come from Vicky Sargeant at the Socitm press office and I offer it to you verbatim simply because I don’t have time to fully digest it and add links just now, there doesn’t seem to be a apge to link too, but I don’t want to forget to share it with you:
News Release:
County Councils saw their web traffic double last Friday and Saturday thanks to their provision of a sophisticated online election results service coupled with use of social media tolls like Twitter, Facebook, RSS feeds and email alerts.
Figures from the Socitm Website Takeup service, subscribed to by more than half of all county councils show that on Friday 5th and Saturday 6th June, web traffic to county council websites was more than double that of the Friday and Saturday of the previous week.
This trend is bourne out by results from individual councils like Derbyshire, which last Friday saw the highest ever number of visits to its website in one day including more than 19,000 visits to its election section alone.
The sophistication of the election results coverage by councils through their websites has been captured through a survey by Socitm Insight, publishers of the annual Better connected report on council website quality. The survey looked at websites of county councils and new unitaries where elections had been held to see how the results were being reported. It followed a similar exercise carried out at the last county elections in May 2005.
The survey found that almost all councils were reporting results on their websites ‘live’ or as near to real-time as possible and were carrying very prominent links and features on the home page. Many included some form of interactive map, summary tables and charts or other graphics to allow visitors to follow the results as they happened and to access a summary in various forms. Some councils provided TV style graphics including ‘virtual council chambers’ filling up with figures in party colours as the results came in.
A few councils provided a live online comparison with previous election results, showing whether seats were being held, lost or gained. A number of councils stated when the count was due to start, but even better were councils who offered an estimate as to what time the first result was likely to be expected.
Nine councils were also promoting their use of RSS feeds and / or Twitter to publish the results, using these opportunities for to enhance their interaction with the public through these new channels. During the results period, fans on Derbyshire’s Facebook page rose from 22 to 73 and their Twitter account followers rose from 122 to 335. Derbyshire’s Facebook ‘fans’ were contributing comments, and responding to one another as the day unfolded. One said ‘Local newspaper site reporting recounts in Long Eaton while Twitter and @derbyshirecc knows its over. SO behind. V. poor compared to you guys. Many thanks for all the hard work pulling this together today’.
Other innovations noted on election pages included:
Norfolk County Council – featured its YouTube video on why you should vote
Lancashire County Council – offered the facility to subscribe to receive results by e-mail
North Yorkshire County Council – featured a video about how the democratic process works
Surrey County Council – charts included a summary of holds and a swing chart
‘Our survey provides evidence of the opportunity local councils now have to use their website and social media tools to engage with and inform local people as never before’, says Martin Greenwood, Programme Director for Socitm Insight. ‘Councils are no longer dependent on traditional media to communicate their messages and can outperform them anyway as a source of immediate, authoritative and totally up to date information – we have seen this with local emergencies like flooding, and now with elections. Councils should be seizing this new opportunity with both hands.’
A year ago I delivered a presentation at the Local Government Communications annual conference called Naked in a Goldfish Bowl. It was an evangelising rant, a wake up call for an audience that was, to a degree, still getting used to “new media” an unaware of possibilities and implications of social media. I wanted them to understand that whilst they concentrated their efforts on relating to the media they were left “exposed” by the conversations about their work going on on the net.
Last month I was back again and a great deal has changed in that time. As Liz demonstrates with her research, local government has rushed to understand social web tools. So this this time I tried something much more modest. A few examples of what might be working, all on a very modest scale, and a chance for people to talk about them. These were my slides:
Later this month a group of enthusiasts will get together to run another one of Birmingham’s Social Media Surgeries. It wasn’t supposed to be like this. The original idea was just one as a practical contribution to Blog Action Day, set up by volunteers and run by volunteers.
So far we’ve done five, (I counted wrong before!) three at BVSC and Two at Fazeley Studios. The results:
At least 60 people from probably 50 organisations – helped. That’s based on numbers for 3 surgeries, because for two of them we were so busy we all forgot to record who was there and where they were from.
At least 33 volunteer surgeons involved, many of them repeat offenders. They probably average about 5 hours of effort each, plus the organisers, means a minimum of 175 hours of high quality, highly skilled voluntary effort.
Since that first evening – a number of sites have been set up or emerged. For example:
Birmingham’s Jubilee Debt Campaign came out of that first night and Audrey and Duncan Miller have kept on using it, because they prefer it to their old site.
The Digbeth Trust is switching it’s web platforms to use more social media after being helped to appreciate the benefits as a surgery patient on a couple of occasions.
The Ramblers locally is now using this blog to explain how they’re getting people walking in the city and Mohini, who works for them, has already started a blog about Mangoes!
Other place based sites pop up.
Acocks Green Neighbourhood Forum has started with this site and already begun connecting with other verylocal sites.
Tony at www.cannonhillpeoplespark.net has been along looking for advice on how else they can use the web whilst John Heaven, from well established Lozells.info, also got some great advice on what they can do next.
These are just some examples, I’m pretty sure there is stuff I’ve forgotten or don’t know about.
Some people didn’t want to plunge straight into using social media for a charity, their neighbourhood or work and so we have helped create at least half a dozen personal blogs. Some have fallen silent, others are used with great passion.
This video helps show how much people enjoy the surgeries, and that they are not always the folk you most expect:
We don’t expect it to stick first time and we encourage people to come back. When they book for the second time, it is their comments that encourage us.
They include the very practical: “So useful last time, need a little more help with developing the blog lay out,” and “just a matter of fine tuning my site to send it public” or “thanks to the brilliant advice and support we got last time it inspired us to put our website up (just), and we’ll be along to discuss building on our social support!”.
Notice the language. These people feel like they own these bits of the web. In the past efforts like this have been more likely to lead to moribund pages on communal portals.
Sometimes people come back already comfortable with the basics and hungry to understand more technical aspects of how the social web encourages conversation: We want to “extend our blog skills to improve how we use trackback and linking” or: “placing of images within text. What are pingbacks?”.
Over time they are encouraged to use video, host images in more social places, perhaps even experiment with twitter.
Aspirations vary. Some want to “promote our government funded service to the local community.” Others “as a fundraiser for this organisation , I really need to know how to use social networking sites, develop a blog for former members and to learn about keeping a website up to date. Not all at once!”
“Not all at once” is important. The one to one (or almost) surgeries mean that people learn what they need as and when they need it. It is also less intimidating for anyone to go from learner to teacher, so the number of potential volunteer surgeons grows all the time.
It ain’t broken really.
I’ve been thinking of ways to change or improve what we do, but mostly people don’t want us to meddle:
To the best of my counting, so far 33 different people have been volunteer surgeons. Some have been at every event, others have come to one and helped hand out tea. They are not all from Birmingham, Paul Henderson has come from Warwickshire, Paul Webster Yorkshire (yes, Yorkshire on 2 evenings) Philip Oakley, Kate Spragg, Kasper Sorensen and Simon Howes wend their way from different spots in the Black Country.
Diane at Fazeley Studios has worked as a volunteer receptionist for us and Candy Passmore at BVSC gave us immediate and generous help with a venue and support for the first three surgeries. Digital Birmingham and Be Birmingham have also given us great support by passing the dates around to their networks and encouraging active citizens to come.
What do the surgeons have in common?
As far as I can tell nothing more than a desire to help and a belief that social media can advance community groups and community activity.
We are also all connected to each other through various online and real world networks formed or nurtured in Birmingham over the last couple of years, some further back than that. Without those networks being both online and real world we may not have got to know each other well enough to be happy to collaborate like this.
What keeps people coming back to give their time? My guess is that most found that being a surgeon helped them learn faster and learn more. They also care about Birmingham as a place. It can be exhilarating. In fact, it makes me feel great.
Why else would we do it?
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.