I’m rootling through my feed reader catching up.
On Thursday Tom Watson announced that Crown Copyright was to be revised so those wanting to data mash with information from the Office of Public Sector Information will now be automatically granted a license. With a rather neat turn of phrase “They say information is power, but only distributed information is truly empowering” he went on to say:
the Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI) has looked again at the restrictions of Crown Copyright, and now a licence will automatically be granted to anyone wanting to use the information rather than having to apply beforehand. OPSI has also shown how Government can publish in a ‘web-friendly’ way rather than just as PDFs, and I want to see this approach rolled out across Government. Today I’m pleased to announce that COI is launching new standards on quality to make Government sites as effective and easy to use as possible.”
The Guardian has been continuing it’s Free Our Data reporting, with Charles Arthur a little underwhelmed by the announcements above:
Umm. It’s not quite the revolution that some of us were hoping for. It doesn’t even yet seem to legitimise the re-use and repurposing by sites such as theyworkforyou.com of the contents of Hansard – which is Crown copyright. That’s the trouble with tectonic shifts, though. Nothing seems to happen for a very long time, and then sometimes it happens all at once.
I don’t agree, (and neither does Tim Davies) the shift won’t be seismic in the sense of some sort of overnight social media sensation. The last 5 years has seen steady change and the groundwork is still going on at government level. The COI’s social media guidance document (a pdf – tut) says civil servants should:
Help non-governmental bodies to build new services by structuring information so that they can combine public data with private data. Avoid replicating what is already being undertaken by non-governmental bodies.
Wednesday saw the launch of a 12 week consultation called Archives for the 21st Century, again data, how we capture and share it will be at the heart of this. The press information mentions one wonderful example of a data set created from digitising the log books of ships going back to the 17th century. Hour after hour mariners from Britain, Holland, France and Spain would log the time, their position and the weather. The CLIWOC project is now a database for Climate Change Study. Another example they use is Birmingham Stories.
Also on Wednesday Downing Street restored the e-mail the Prime Minister service and Hazel Blears announced that one way for councils to save £600 million a year was by listening to their communities. This riled Julian Dobson who called it an “empowerment heist”:
‘Involving communities are key to unlocking greater savings – when it comes to finding efficiencies, empowering local people is part of the solution, not part of the problem,’ she said.
There is of course some truth in this – councils that listen to local people and provide services that are valued will achieve more for their money. But the crude equation of ‘empowerment’ with savings is dangerous nonsense: there’s no rationale for turning what may be a fortunate by-product in some circumstances into the raison d’etre. Yesterday’s speech might have been excusable were it not for the ten years of rhetoric that had preceded it.
Ofqual’s new Chief Officers report has been made comment-able and Spaghettitesting listed the Government winners of the Webby’s including a non-governmental site from the transparency movement GovernmentDocs.org.